Financial performance evaluation of Tesla, Inc. using integrated ratio and DuPont analysis for 2021–2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.68210/jgeor.a22Keywords:
financial performance, financial ratios, DuPont analysis, cash flow, peer benchmarkingAbstract
The financial performance of Tesla, Inc. from 2021 to 2025 is analyzed using a case-study approach that includes ratio analysis, three-step DuPont decomposition, cash-flow indicators, a specific adjustment for the 2023 tax benefit, and a 2025 peer comparison with BYD, Ford and General Motors. The analysis is based on annual filings audited and adjusted by average levels of assets and equity if necessary. As per the results, Tesla's operating profitability and asset utilization have been declining since 2022, with the worst results being witnessed in 2024. The approximately $5.93 billion difference was due to a non-cash one-time tax benefit, materially affecting reported 2023 net income of $15.00 billion. Once they remove this figure for diagnostic purposes, net income drops to $9.07 billion, net margin to 9.37%, ROA to 9.60% and ROE to 16.89%. By 2025, operating margin fell to 4.59%, ROE to 4.89%, operating current ratio to 2.16 and liabilities-to-equity to an still relatively low 0.67. Operating cash flow remained positive in all years and FCF bounced back to approximately $6.22 billion in 2025. Based on the peer comparison, Tesla has a combination of strong liquidity, conservative liability profile, and below-average shareholder returns compared to BYD, and slightly below-average ROE compared to General Motors. The results are meant to be a diagnosis of the firm's finances and not an inference on the industry.
Downloads
References
Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00843.x
Beaver, W. H. (1966). Financial ratios as predictors of failure. Journal of Accounting Research, 4, 71–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490171
Bunea, O.-I., Corbos, R.-A., & Popescu, R.-I. (2019). Influence of some financial indicators on return on equity ratio in the Romanian energy sector: A competitive approach using a DuPont-based analysis. Energy, 189, 116251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116251
BYD Company Limited. (2026). Annual report 2025. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited. https://www1.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/sehk/2026/0327/2026032703008.pdf
Davidson, W. (2020). Analysis of profitability using the DuPont analysis. In W. Davidson (Ed.), Financial Statement Analysis. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119743217.ch3
Endris, H., & Babu, N. K. (2026). Examining financial performance of manufacturing companies: An extended DuPont analysis. Future Business Journal, 12, 82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-026-00792-y
Ford Motor Company. (2026). Annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Accession No. 0000037996-26-000015. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/37996/000003799626000015/f-20251231.htm
General Motors Company. (2026). Annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Accession No. 0001467858-26-000013. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1467858/000146785826000013/gm-20251231.htm
Jape, S., & Malhotra, M. (2023). A study of DuPont model: Its application and identification of key determinants for public limited companies. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 35(1–2), 173–202. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBG.2023.134396
Jaworski, J., & Czerwonka, L. (2024). Profitability and working capital management: A meta-study in macroeconomic and institutional conditions. DECISION, 51(1), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-023-00372-x
Jin, Y. (2017). DuPont analysis, earnings persistence, and return on equity: Evidence from mandatory IFRS adoption in Canada. Accounting Perspectives, 16(3), 205–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12142
Nissim, D., & Penman, S. H. (2001). Ratio analysis and equity valuation: From research to practice. Review of Accounting Studies, 6, 109–154. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011338221623
Ohlson, J. A. (1980). Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490395
Silva, F., & Silva, S. (2026). Working capital management and corporate performance: The role of financial constraints. International Review of Economics & Finance, 106, 104926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2026.104926
Singh, H. P., Kumar, S., & Colombage, S. (2017). Working capital management and firm profitability: A meta-analysis. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 9(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-06-2016-0018
Soliman, M. T. (2008). The use of DuPont analysis by market participants. The Accounting Review, 83(3), 823–853. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.3.823
Tesla, Inc. (2022). Annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 (Form 10-K). U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Accession No. 0000950170-22-000796. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000095017022000796/tsla-20211231.htm
Tesla, Inc. (2023). Annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 (Form 10-K). U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Accession No. 0000950170-23-001409. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000095017023001409/tsla-20221231.htm
Tesla, Inc. (2024). Annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 (Form 10-K). U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Accession No. 0001628280-24-002390. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000162828024002390/tsla-20231231.htm
Tesla, Inc. (2025). Annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (Form 10-K). U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Accession No. 0001628280-25-003063. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000162828025003063/tsla-20241231.htm
Tesla, Inc. (2026). Annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 (Form 10-K). U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Accession No. 0001628280-26-003952. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000162828026003952/tsla-20251231.htm
Weidman, S. M., McFarland, D. J., Meric, G., & Meric, I. (2019). Determinants of return-on-equity in USA, German and Japanese manufacturing firms. Managerial Finance, 45(3), 445–451. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-07-2018-0305
Yasmin, S., & Mohiuddin, M. (2021). A meta-analysis of the role of working capital management on firm profitability. Global Business and Economics Review, 25(3–4), 400–423. https://doi.org/10.1504/GBER.2021.118727
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Green Economy and Optimization Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © The Author(s).
Authors retain copyright in their work and grant the Journal of Green Economy and Optimization Research (JGEOR) the right of first publication.
Articles published in JGEOR are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the Creative Commons licence is provided, and any changes made are indicated.
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission to reproduce any third-party material that is not covered by the article's Creative Commons licence.
